AMENDMENTS THAT MATTER: DUE PROCESS

Originally posted by AmericasVoiceOnline.org

If you think the Senate Judiciary Committee’s markup of the Gang of 8 bill has been intense so far, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet. As the SJC moves into Titles II and III of the bill—which cover everything from E-Verify to detention policy to family immigration to agricultural workers, not to mention the path to citizenship itself—we’re highlighting some of the major areas we expect to see addressed, and the amendments we’re particularly hopeful about or upset by within each one. That’s why we’re starting this “Amendments that Matter” blog series today. Below is a guest post from David Leopold of the American Immigration Lawyers Association, writing about due process and the Senate Gang of 8 immigration bill.

Also view our list of key amendments filed in the Senate Judiciary Committee to S. 744

“Due process and fundamental fairness” are not words often associated with immigration enforcement, especially the deportation process.  So, as the Senate Judiciary considers the interior enforcement provisions contained Title III keep a close eye on a several amendments, some promising, others not so much, which go to the heart of due process in immigration proceedings.

Here are a couple of the amendments to root for:

Blumenthal 14— This amendment goes a long way toward restoring due process and fundamental fairness to the immigration courts by proposing four basic due process improvements, including:

  • Giving respect to state court judgments to vacate, expunge, or otherwise nullify their own judgments of conviction.
  • Preventing the removal of noncitizens from the US for an offense that would not have resulted in deportation at the time the time it was committed.  This long-overdue provision reflects our most basic value of fairness.
  • Enhancing the procedural protections already in the bill which protects the rights of noncitizens in removal proceedings. Importantly, it adds much needed protections to noncitizens who, through no fault of their own—they were not notified of the hearing date, they were seriously ill, they were attending to a family emergency—did not appear at their removal hearing.
  • Making important technical changes which would prevent the deportation of individuals for minor offenses, including in some cases offenses for which they spent no time in prison.

Coons 5—This amendment ensures that a noncitizen facing deportation will receive a copy of their immigration file.  That’s important because immigration law is very complex.  Even though a person may be subject to deportation, the immigration law may include the right to apply to the immigration judge for the right to remain lawfully in the US.  But a person in deportation proceedings may not even know he or she is eligible for relief from deportation without looking at their immigration file.  By giving immigrants in deportation proceedings a chance to review their immigration history, this amendment strengthens the integrity of our immigration courts.

And here are a couple of amendments that are cause concern:

Grassley 43—The base bill already gets tough on noncitizens convicted of gang related crimes.  But as the Los Angeles Times said on its editorial page, this amendment goes too far by “excluding immigrants who have no criminal history simply because their names appear in a database of gang members or on a gang injunction.” Relying on factors like tattoos, style of dress, ethnic background, or neighborhood associations,  it gives no opportunity for an alleged gang member to present his/her case to a judge and could lead to racial profiling and discrimination..

Grassley 44—The bill already provides tough provisions against drunk driving. But this amendment goes too far by making 3 drunk driving offenses an aggravated felony.  That would mean automatic detention and permanent exile, regardless of how old the offense is, U.S. family ties, or evidence of rehabilitation. It would also apply to DUI convictions that occurred years ago, regardless of rehabilitation, offending our basic notions of due process and fairness.

Grassley 45-47–These amendments would lead to the imprisonment of more immigrants for what is essentially a status offense, wasting taxpayer dollars, worsening prison crowding problems, and diverting law enforcement from going after traffickers, smugglers, and other dangerous criminals.

 

The amendments would also needlessly harm immigrants who are actually victims of domestic violence.  Often, both parties in a domestic dispute are arrested, and at times, the person who speaks less English or is undocumented is mistaken for the abuser.  That will harm our communities by breaking up families and putting domestic violence survivors at risk of deportation.

Finally these amendments would strip long-needed due process protections and procedural improvements to the fairness and efficiency of the immigration custody review process contained in S.744. It also eliminates an important provision that would align immigration bond determinations with criminal justice standards.

As the Senate marks up Title III it is critical that the senators strike an important balance between necessary enforcement of the immigration law and the protection of fundamental fairness and due process.  We need to ensure that the immigration law ultimately enacted by Congress jealously guards the cherished freedoms and protections we all hold dear.

Tagged as: Amendments that MatterImmigrationImmigration 2013Immigration Reform,Legislation

America’s Future In 844 Pages

Originally posted on Huffington Post

The time for talk is over.

Early this morning the bipartisan bill put together by the Senate “Gang of Eight” through painstaking negotiation and old-fashioned hard work was released. Whatever position you take on immigration reform the senators’ bill, or the “Border Security, Economic Opportunity, and Immigration Modernization Act,” represents a critical break in the partisan bickering that has paralyzed Washington for far too long. The issue is not whether we can all agree on every provision of the Senate bill — of course we won’t. But Senators Rubio (R-FL), Schumer (D-NY), McCain (R-AZ), Menendez (D-NJ), Graham (R-SC), Durbin (D-IL), Bennet (D-CO), and Flake (R-AZ) have shown the country that “politics as usual” can still be courageously cast aside for the good of the country.

It’s now time for the rest of us to roll up our sleeves and get to the hard, unglamorous work of rebuilding a broken immigration system into one that puts America first. We have a bill before the Senate, a legislative proposal to review and digest, and a patriotic duty to pass immigration reform now.

Make no mistake. There is a long road ahead before America creates an immigration process that will keep our borders secure, keep American families safe and together, give American business the tools it needs to compete in a global economy, provide a roadmap to citizenship for the 11 million aspiring citizens now living in the shadows, and restore due process to the immigration courts.

There will be much to praise, criticize and pick apart in the days and weeks to come. But for those who love this country, for those who cherish everything that has made America that “shining city on the hill” that President Reagan so beautifully envisioned, there is no choice now. America needs immigration reform.

We need to find a humane, reasonable solution for the 11 million undocumented immigrants and the bill does that; we need to ensure the border is secure and provides for the safe movement of people, and the bill does that; we need to welcome the best and the brightest to our shores — the innovators, job creators, researchers, STEM professionals — and the bill does that; we need a well-designed temporary worker program that protects the wages and working conditions of U.S. workers and includes a path to citizenship, and the bill does that.

This group of senators has proven that it can break through the political gridlock and put the country first by producing a good and fair bill. Now everyone — from legislators to advocates — has to stand up and do everything in our power to make sure this effort comes to fruition. We cannot rest until it is enacted, because the work isn’t done until then. We must continue to put forth a great effort because these opportunities only come along once in a generation. Shame on all of us if it fails.

Let’s not make the perfect the enemy of the amazing. We must pass immigration reform now. America deserves nothing less.

Follow David Leopold on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DavidLeopold

READ IT: The TEXT of The Senate #Immigration Bill. #TimeIsNow

READ/DOWNLOAD THE SENATE BILL—> HERE

The #TimeIsNow: Five Reasons Why Congress Will Pass #Immigration Reform

Originally posted on the AILA Leadership Blog by David Leopold

Things are different this time around.

The passion is different, the energy is different and, most of all, America is different.  As Congress gets ready to take on what is arguably the most contentious issue in the country, there is no mistaking it: America is ready to create an immigration process that will protect our borders, keep our families safe and together, give our businesses the tools they need to compete in the global economy, and provide a roadmap to citizenship for the 11 million aspiring citizens currently living in the shadows.

And why are things different?  Here’s what’s changed since 2007, the last time an immigration bill was presented to Congress:

1.       The Latino Vote

The 2012 presidential election will be remembered not only for the re-election of the first African-American president, but for the power of the Latino vote.  To be sure, as Americans, Latinos are concerned about issues other than immigration—including health care, the economy, gun violence, and education.  But for them, the broken immigration system is personal.  It doesn’t go away with the flick of a television switch. Many Latino voters have a family member or close friend entangled in the web of arcane rules and confusing regulations known as U.S. immigration law.  Someone in their life–a parent, a brother, a cousin, a friend– is threatened with deportation.

Last year, President Obama, after presiding over record numbers of deportations during his first term, promised Latino voters that if re-elected he would put immigration reform at the top of his “to do” list.  Governor Romney, on the other hand, embraced restrictionists like Kris Kobach and Joe Arpaio, railed against “amnesty” and promised Latinos little more than “self-deportation”.

The lesson of the election: Latinos are a formidable force in American politics and can no longer be ignored.

2.       The DREAMERs Are Now Doers

A funny thing happened since the DREAM Act was first introduced in 2001.  The DREAMERs grew up.  And they grew up as Americans, watching football, going to homecoming dances, eating hotdogs on the 4th of July and dreaming about giving back to the country they’ve struggled against all odds to enrich. They are no longer the helpless children who were brought to the U.S. by their parents.  Today they are, in effect, undocumented Americans.

Through masterful use of 21st century tools like Facebook and Twitter, coupled with old fashioned organizing and courage, the DREAMERs have become a key voice in the struggle for immigration reform.  They, more than any other group, deserve the lion’s share of credit for pushing the Administration to grant an administrative deportation reprieve to qualified undocumented youth last year.

And for DREAMERs there is no giving up on their journey toward US citizenship.  They will no longer take no for an answer.

 3.      There Has Been Unprecedented Immigration Enforcement

Unlike in 2007, today the border is secure. A recent report published by the American Immigration Lawyers Association found that the border security benchmarks of the past immigration reform bills have been met or exceeded. These include improvements in border infrastructure and technology, detention facilities, and increased border personnel. In fact illegal crossings are down to their lowest levels in 40 years.

4.       Business and Labor Agree on a Guest Worker Program

The fact that business and labor could come to an agreement on a guest worker program — perhaps one of the most contentious issues in the immigration reform debate — means the energy is there, the desire is there, and the need is there for immigration reform this year. And if the AFL-CIO and U.S. Chamber of Commerce can find common ground, then Democrats and Republicans in Washington can too.

5.       The American Public Supports Immigration Reform

According to a recent NBC News/Wall Street Journal poll 76% of Americans support creating an immigration process that includes a roadmap to citizenship for the 11 million new American immigrants if they pay a fine, back taxes and complete a background check.  Most Americans, 54% according to the poll, believe immigration strengthens America—that’s up from 47% a year ago.

So, that’s why we’re here, in this place, at this moment, ready to move forward on immigration reform. The time is now, now is the time.

USCIS Extends Temporary Protected Status for Nicaraguans

From USCIS:

WASHINGTON— Secretary of Homeland Security Janet Napolitano has extended Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for eligible nationals of Nicaragua for an additional 18 months, beginning July 6, 2013, and ending Jan. 5, 2015.

Current Nicaraguan beneficiaries seeking to extend their TPS status must re-register during the 60-day re-registration period that runs from April 3, 2013, through June 3, 2013. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) encourages beneficiaries to register as soon as possible once the 60-day re-registration period begins. Applications will not be accepted before April 3, 2013.

The 18-month extension also allows TPS re-registrants to apply for a new employment authorization document (EAD). Eligible Nicaraguan TPS beneficiaries who request an EAD and meet the re-registration deadline will receive a new EAD with an expiration date of Jan. 5, 2015. USCIS recognizes that some re-registrants may not receive their new EADs until after their current EADs expire. Therefore, USCIS is automatically extending current TPS Nicaragua EADs that have a July 5, 2013, expiration date for an additional six months. These existing EADs are now valid through Jan. 5, 2014.

For the complete article – please visit Temporary Protected Status Extended for Nicaraguans on the uscis.gov website

There Is No Such Thing As An ‘Illegal Alien’

Originally posted on Huffington Post

Yes, you read it correctly. There really is no such thing.

And not because the Associated Press announced a long overdue change to its Stylebook yesterday and will no longer use “illegal alien”, “illegal” or “illegals” to describe noncitizens unlawfully present in the U.S.

It’s because no human being should ever be described as “illegal.”

Period.

These insensitive terms are also legally incorrect. They erroneously imply that a noncitizen unlawfully in the U.S. is, by virtue of his or her very presence, committing a criminal offense, rather than a civil immigration violation. Is it surprising then that many Americans buy the false restrictionist line that all unlawfully present foreign nationals are criminals? In fact, there is only a discrete group of non-citizens whose very presence in the U.S. is a crime, including those who illegally reentered the country after deportation.

But the argument against the use of these words to describe people is not merely technical. Words really matter in the age of Twitter where 140 character tweets can fly around the world in nanoseconds. Reference to a human being as “illegal” overly simplifies and unfairly characterizes the complexities of the national immigration reform debate. The dysfunctional immigration law which plagues American families and business is a convoluted web of nonsensical rules and regulations that can easily trap any foreign national into an unfixable civil immigration violation.

After years and years of video loops running on the cable television networks, for many Americans the term “illegal alien” conjures up images of people illegally jumping over the Southern border. Most people would be surprised to learn that nearly half the undocumented population entered the U.S. legally. Some came as visitors, others as students, and others as temporary workers. Some fell out of status because they took ill and were forced to drop out of school, others because they fell victim to domestic violence or other crimes, and others because their sponsoring employer mistreated them. Even those foreign nationals that entered the country surreptitiously in direct violation of the immigration law are not “illegal”. Some, like victims of human trafficking, are eligible for protection, not prosecution, under our immigration law.

Over the past two decades the restrictionists — those who seek to cut off virtually all immigration and hang a “Closed for Business” sign around the neck of the Statue of Liberty — have cynically promoted terms like “illegal alien”, “illegal” and “illegals” to dehumanize noncitizens who are in the U.S. with or without lawful immigration status. The effort is designed to scare the American public and appeal to peoples’ darkest, most base instincts.

And for many years it was an effective, albeit nefarious, strategy. In 2007, the last time Congress considered immigration reform legislation, a small cadre of nativist groups virtually overloaded the telephone lines to the U.S. Capitol with bitter attacks on “amnesty for illegals”.

Thankfully, with the increasing political clout of Latino voters — as demonstrated by the last election — politicians and the media are taking a hard look at the words they use to talk about immigration. It would be unimaginable today for a presidential candidate — Republican or Democrat — to again run a national campaign using the terms “illegal alien,” “illegal” or “illegals.” These obnoxious words have been revealed for what they are — racially charged slurs which have no place in America’s national immigration conversation or in the media that reports about it.

The Associated Press did the right thing by finally dropping these ugly descriptors from its Stylebook because such words have no place in objective reporting. Hopefully, other major media outlets will follow the AP’s lead.

Follow David Leopold on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DavidLeopold

Comprehensive Immigration Reform Gathers Unstoppable Momentum

Originally posted on Huffington Post Politics
The question now is not whether, but when.

I’m talking about a major overhaul of America’s dysfunctional immigration system. With Friday’s agreement between the AFL-CIO and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce on the terms of a guest worker program it’s clear that immigration reform is going to be a reality this time around. The momentum is unstoppable.

The agreement, which bridged a gap that potentially threatened a broader immigration overhaul, provides for an immigrant guest worker program which includes a pathway to permanent residence. According to press reports, a new temporary immigrant “W Visa” will be created for “low skilled” workers in shortage occupations, including immigrants in hospitality, janitorial, retail, and construction jobs; you know, the folks that clean hotel rooms, wash dishes in stuffy restaurant kitchens, pick fruit in the blazing sun, and toil in the construction industry — occupations which, in fact, require a lot of focus, dedication and, yes, skill.

The agreement protects American workers by regulating guest worker wage levels and tying the number of available visas to the strength of the U.S. economy, including the unemployment rate. According to BloombergBusinessweek, the program “would start with 20,000 visas in the first year, 35,000 in the second, 55,000 in the third and 75,000 in the fourth. On year five the number would grow or shrink based on a formula that takes into account the unemployment rate, the number of job openings and other factors.”

As we’d expect with any major policy proposal there will be plenty of analysis, criticism, and second guessing over the next several days as Congress gets set to reconvene after the Easter/Passover break. But what’s crystal clear is that two traditionally adverse interest groups have hammered out an agreement which trumpets — indeed screams — that America needs comprehensive immigration reform.

The fact that business and labor could come together on a well-designed guest worker program — perhaps one of the most contentious issues in the immigration reform debate — means the energy is there, the desire is there, and the need is there for immigration reform. And if the AFL-CIO and U.S. Chamber of Commerce can find common ground when an agreement seemed all but impossible a few days ago, then Democrats and Republicans in Washington can too.

Follow me on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DavidLeopold

READ: #Ohio #BMV Announcement Granting Driver’s License Eligiblity to #DACA Grantees. #immigration

Download the Ohio BMV Announcement here —> 03-29-13_DACAv2

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE March 29, 2013
OHIO BMV TO BEGIN ISSUING TEMPORARY DRIVER LICENSES TO
QUALIFIED DACA GRANTEES

COLUMBUS – Today the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles (BMV) instructed the
state’s Deputy Registrars to begin issuing temporary driver licenses to qualified
Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) grantees, but only after first
confirming applicants’ immigration documents via the U.S. Citizen and Immigration
Services (USCIS) database. The extra security steps are designed to combat fraud
or the use of counterfeit documents. BMV’s decision was established after reviewing
guidance expressed by Ohio Attorney General Mike DeWine that DACA grantees are
eligible for temporary driver licenses under Ohio law.
The BMV’s instructions to Deputy Registrars will ensure consistent procedures are
followed statewide when issuing the temporary licenses. Confirmation of applicants’
immigrant documents will be made via the federal government’s immigration
database to verify their authenticity. Upon verification of applicants’ documents they
will be issued a non-renewable/temporary license valid for the time period of their
work authorization issued by USCIS, not to exceed two years.
The federal government allows DACA grantees to work in the U.S. during the twoyear length of their DACA status. Individuals are eligible for DACA status if: they
arrived in the U.S. before the age of 16; have no criminal history; are currently in
school; have graduated from high school or received a general education
development (GED) certificate; have been honorably discharged from the Coast
Guard or Armed Forces of the United States; and are under the age of 31.
Currently 37 other states also issue temporary drivers licenses to DACA grantees.
Ohio is one of the few states to take the extra step of also confirming applicants’
immigration documents through the federal government’s database.

To view a summary of the Deputy Registrar directive, click here

Senators take a road trip to the border

Originally posted on The Hill’s Congress Blog

By David Leopold

The “Gang of Eight” senators working on an immigration reform bill say they are near agreement on a bill. But not until four of them, Sens. Michael Bennet (D-Colo.), Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.), tour the Arizona-Mexico border this week and hold a press conference.

I’m not sure why they need this excursion to the border — especially Sens. McCain and Flake who are both from Arizona (I imagine they’ve seen it before). Sens. Schumer and Bennet will find a high tech, impenetrable fence which traverses most of the Southwest United States and does a pretty good job of keeping out migrants.

What they’ll find is that the border couldn’t be more secure. A recent report published by the American Immigration Lawyers Association found that the border security benchmarks of the past immigration reform bills have been met or exceeded. These include improvements in border infrastructure and technology, detention facilities, and increased border personnel. In fact illegal crossings are down to their lowest levels in 40 years.

But, if the reason for the senators’ trip is to satisfy themselves that the border is secure enough for Congress to finally do something about fixing our country’s dysfunctional immigration system, I think I can save them the journey. Here’s what they’ll find:

In El Paso, Texas, standing on the U.S. side of the border looking south into Mexico, senators will see the squalid neighborhoods of Ciudad Juarez, until recently considered the most dangerous city in the world outside a declared war zone. Along the U.S.-Mexico border, behind the fence, they’ll see U.S. Border Patrol vehicles placed at strategic locations to ensure the apprehension of immigrants who do manage to make it past the motion detectors and other virtual barriers designed to keep them on the Mexican side of the Rio Grande.

The senators shouldn’t miss the opportunity to venture north from Texas into New Mexico. It’s well worth a trip up Interstate 25 along the meandering Rio Grande and past the small towns that dot the landscape on north to Albuquerque. The senators will pass through a U.S. Border Patrol checkpoint just north of Las Crucas and south of Hatch where all vehicles are stopped and checked for undocumented passengers. The senators should spend some time in Arrey, just south of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico. There they’ll get a firsthand look at the Border Patrol agents sitting in their vehicles eyeing the residents — including U.S. citizens — and checking the immigration status of anyone who doesn’t “look legal”.

And as long as they’re interested in border security the senators should include America’s northern frontier to their itinerary. There’s a lot to see up there; nationwide the number of Border Patrol agents along the northern border rose from about 340 agents before September 11, 2001, to more than 2,200 agents by 2011.

The Senators might want to start with a ride across northern Ohio on State Route 2 where frequent stops of travelers by U.S. Border Patrol agents over the past several years have led to claims of racial profiling and spawned litigation. At Port Clinton, Ohio they can tour the spanking new U.S. Border Patrol station which opened last year at a reported cost of $25 million. The purpose of the facility, according to U.S. immigration officials, is to stop unregulated cross-border traffic from Canada. As a resident of Northern Ohio I sleep a lot easier these days just knowing it’s there to stop all the illegal immigrants swimming across Lake Erie, especially in the dead of winter.

As they cross Ohio’s northern highways the senators are likely to see U.S. Border Patrol vehicles patrolling for undocumented immigrants. The Senators will find much of the same to the east on the New York Thruway where Customs and Border Protection officers often board commercial buses and demand passengers’ proof of immigration status.

Importantly, the senators should resist the politically charged temptation to tie an immigration overhaul – including a pathway to citizenship for the 11 million undocumented immigrants living in America’s shadows—to unmeasurable indicators of border security. They would be well advised to heed the advice of Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano, herself a former Arizona governor who soundly rejected the idea that the government could treat a single metric of border security as a trigger that leads to comprehensive immigration reform. Speaking to reporters yesterday about border security and the need for Congress to enact comprehensive immigration reform Napolitano’s response was clear, “I think now is the time…the system we have needs to be rebooted.”

Rubio’s State of the Union Response: An Historic Opportunity to Lead

Originally posted on Huffington Post

Senator Marco Rubio (R-FLA) will make history Tuesday night. For the first time in the nation’s history, he will deliver a response to the president’s State of the Union address in two languages, English and Spanish. He is the son of Cuban immigrants and, no pressure here, considered by some to be the GOP’s greatest hope to repair its shattered image. His bottom line political objective will be to reach out to Latino voters who, quite frankly, have been repelled by the GOP’s embrace of extremist anti-immigrant policy proposals, such as “self-deportation” and opposition to the DREAM Act. The GOP is betting that Rubio, recently dubbed the party’s “savior” by Time Magazine, will put a young, dynamic, Latino face on a Republican party whose brand remains badly tarnished.

But Rubio has an opportunity to do much more than mend fences for the Republicans. He has an historic chance to show he is not a merely a politician tasked by party elders to reach out to a disgruntled constituency, but a statesman. He can embody the bipartisan leadership in Congress that our nation needs: senators and representatives who are willing to put politics aside and partner with President Obama in an effort to fix the dysfunctional mess of an immigration system that plagues America, tearing families apart and stifling the economy. He can be the courageous leader the GOP needs, one with the guts to wrench his party out of the dark corner of the anti-immigrant fringe and into an enlightened national conversation on immigration reform.

How can he meet all these expectations? First, he should answer President Obama’s address by embracing immigration reform proposals which cry out for bipartisan support — maintaining border security, cracking down on unscrupulous employers who game the system and exploit undocumented workers, and revamping the immigration system so that it creates legal avenues to come to America which reflect our nation’s values and economic needs.

But he’ll also need to take it a step further. Since the November election, we’ve seen many GOP leaders publicly recognize the need to create a functional immigration system. House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA), for example, recently came out in support of the DREAM Act, a measure he had previously opposed. Yet Cantor and other GOP leaders, including Speaker John Boehner (R-OH), have stopped short of supporting a pathway to earned citizenship for the 11 million undocumented immigrants currently living in the shadows. Some, such as Rep. Raul Labrador (R-UT), have even opposed giving the undocumented a chance to earn citizenship, a political position which appears calculated to appease the hardcore right.

The extra step Rubio will need to take is one that should resonate for a son of immigrant parents who later became U.S. citizens. He has a unique opportunity to lead his party by courageously endorsing a pathway to earned citizenship. More importantly, he can use the post-State of the Union spotlight to remind the nation, and the world, that America will not tolerate a permanent second class status for any human being.

Rubio has an unprecedented chance to forge bipartisan consensus on immigration reform by endorsing, in a loud and clear voice, the creation of a safe, orderly and just immigration policy which keeps America’s borders secure and safe, protects American families, gives American business the tools it needs to maintain its competitive edge, attracts the best and brightest to our shores, respects the rule of law, and offers the undocumented a road map to full inclusion in the American family.

To my mind, there is no issue that impassions people more than immigration. That’s because it’s about our essence as a people, as a culture, and as a nation. Immigration reminds us where we have been and shows us where we are going as a country. Do we want to be a welcoming nation that opens its arms to people from all over the world, and from all walks of life, or do we want to turn our backs on those in need, and restrict — out of ignorance and xenophobia — immigration reform that will help build our economy? Do we want to be a fair and compassionate people, or do we want to punish those who dream of a better life for their children?

On Tuesday night, Senator Marco Rubio has an extraordinary opportunity to give the country his answer. I look forward to hearing it.

Follow David Leopold on Twitter: www.twitter.com/DavidLeopold
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 3,699 other followers

%d bloggers like this: